簡介：理論語言學(xué)研究,蘇曉軍,挖井,認知語言學(xué)研究什么,,THEOXFORDHANDBOOKOFCOGNITIVELINGUISTICS,EDITEDBYDIRKGEERAERTSANDHUBERTCUYCKENSOXFORDUNIVERSITYPRESS,1364PAGES,OCT2007EDITEDBYDIRKGEERAERTS,PROFESSOROFLINGUISTICS,UNIVERSITYOFLEUVEN,BELGIUM,ANDHUBERTCUYCKENS,PROFESSOROFLINGUISTICS,UNIVERSITYOFLEUVEN,BELGIUM,THEFUTUREOFCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSHANDBOOKPP1517,1）強調(diào)語言的社會方面（SOCIALASPECTSOFLANGUAGE），研究社會認知和社會變異現(xiàn)象（SOCIALCOGNITIONANDSOCIOVARIATIONALPHENOMENA）；2）強調(diào)實證研究方法（EMPIRICALMETHODSWITHINCOGNITIVELINGUISTICS）實驗研究，語料庫研究；3）追求認知語言學(xué)的理論統(tǒng)一性（THEORETICALUNIFICATION），使認知語言學(xué)成為理論上統(tǒng)一的知識體系。,UNIQUECONTRIBUTIONASACHINESE–GOINGINTERNATIONAL,於寧趙曉寰,METAPHORINCULTURE,,METAPHORINCULTUREUNIVERSALITYANDVARIATIONZOLTáNK?VECSESCAMBRIDGEUNIVERSITYPRESS2005,TOWHATEXTENTANDINWHATWAYSISMETAPHORICALTHOUGHTRELEVANTTOANUNDERSTANDINGOFCULTUREANDSOCIETYCANTHECOGNITIVELINGUISTICVIEWOFMETAPHORSIMULTANEOUSLYEXPLAINUNIVERSALITYANDDIVERSITYINMETAPHORICALTHOUGHTCOGNITIVELINGUISTSHAVEDONEIMPORTANTWORKONUNIVERSALASPECTSOFMETAPHOR,BUTTHEYHAVEPAIDLESSATTENTIONTOWHYMETAPHORSVARYBOTHINTERCULTURALLYANDINTRACULTURALLYASEXTENSIVELYASTHEYDOTHISBOOKPROPOSESANEWTHEORYOFMETAPHORVARIATIONFIRSTLY,THEMAJORDIMENSIONSOFMETAPHORVARIATIONAREIDENTIFIEDTHATIS,THOSESOCIALANDCULTURALBOUNDARIESTHATSIGNALDISCONTINUITIESINHUMANEXPERIENCESECONDLY,THEBOOKDESCRIBESWHICHCOMPONENTS,ORASPECTS,OFCONCEPTUALMETAPHORAREINVOLVEDINMETAPHORVARIATION,ANDHOWTHEYAREINVOLVEDTHIRDLY,ITISOLATESTHEMAINCAUSESOFMETAPHORVARIATIONLASTLY,ITDEALSWITHTHEISSUEOFTHEDEGREEOFCULTURALCOHERENCEINTHEINTERPLAYAMONGCONCEPTUALMETAPHORS,EMBODIMENT,ANDCAUSESOFMETAPHORVARIATION,CULTURALMODEL,QUINN,NAOMI1987CONVERGENTEVIDENCEFORACULTURALMODELOFAMERICANMARRIAGEINDOROTHYHOLLANDANDNAOMIQUINN,EDS,CULTURALMODELSINLANGUAGEANDTHOUGHT173–92CAMBRIDGECAMBRIDGEUNIVERSITYPRESS,FORHERCULTURALMODELOFMARRIAGE,QUINN1987INTERVIEWEDHUSBANDSANDWIVESINELEVENMARRIAGESFIFTEENHOURSOFTAPERECORDINGANDAPPLIEDTHETECHNIQUESOFKEYWORDS,METAPHORGROUPING,ANDREASONINGANALYSISTHEMOSTFREQUENTKEYWORDSWERECOMMITMENT,LOVE,ANDFULFILLMENTSHEIDENTIFIEDTHEFOLLOWINGEIGHTTEMPLATES,INHERTERMINOLOGY‘‘PROPOSITIONSCHEMAS,’’AROUNDWHICHTHEMETAPHORSUSEDTOEXPLICATETHESESCHEMASAREGROUPED,1MARRIAGEISENDURING2MARRIAGEISMUTUALLYBENEFICIAL3MARRIAGEISUNKNOWNATTHEOUTSET4MARRIAGEISDIFFICULT5MARRIAGEISEFFORTFUL6MARRIAGEISJOINT7MARRIAGEMAYSUCCEEDORFAIL8MARRIAGEISRISKY,隱喻與文化研究,BOOKSBYNINGYU,FROMBODYTOMEANINGINCULTUREPAPERSONCOGNITIVESEMANTICSTUDIESOFCHINESEAMSTERDAMANDPHILADELPHIAJOHNBENJAMINS2009THECHINESEHEARTINACOGNITIVEPERSPECTIVECULTURE,BODY,ANDLANGUAGEBERLINANDNEWYORKMOUTONDEGRUYTERAPPLICATIONSOFCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSSERIES,122009THECONTEMPORARYTHEORYOFMETAPHORAPERSPECTIVEFROMCHINESEAMSTERDAMANDPHILADELPHIAJOHNBENJAMINSHUMANCOGNITIVEPROCESSINGSERIES,11998,JOURNALARTICLESBYNINGYU1,HEARTANDCOGNITIONINANCIENTCHINESEPHILOSOPHYJOURNALOFCOGNITIONANDCULTURE71/2,27–472007FOLLOWINGTHETHEORYOFCONCEPTUALMETAPHORINCOGNITIVELINGUISTICS,THISPAPERSTUDIESAPREDOMINANTCONCEPTUALMETAPHORINTHEUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEHEARTINANCIENTCHINESEPHILOSOPHYTHEHEARTISTHERULEROFTHEBODY,JOURNALARTICLESBYNINGYU2,THEEYESFORSIGHTANDMINDJOURNALOFPRAGMATICS364,663–6862004THISISASTUDYOFMETONYMICANDMETAPHORICEXPRESSIONSCONTAININGBODYPARTTERMSFORTHEEYESINCHINESE,JOURNALARTICLESBYNINGYU3,CHINESEMETAPHORSOFTHINKINGCOGNITIVELINGUISTICS142/3,141–1652003THISARTICLESTUDIESTWOOFTHEFOURSPECIALCASES,NAMELYTHINKINGISMOVINGANDTHINKINGISSEEING,THATCONSTITUTETHEMETAPHORSYSTEMTHEMINDISABODYINCHINESE,BOOKBYXIAOHUANZHAO,ZHAO,XCLASSICALCHINESESUPERNATURALFICTIONAMORPHOLOGICALHISTORY416PPLEWISTON,NEWYORK,USASECONDEDITION2008,COGNITIVEPOETICSGOALS,GAINSANDGAPS,,MOUTONDEGRUYTER2009,認知語言學(xué)與翻譯研究,BOOKSJOURNALARTICLESMETAPHORANDTRANSLATIONSOMEIMPLICATIONSOFACOGNITIVEAPPROACH,JOURNALOFPRAGMATICS3620041253–1269ACOGNITIVESTYLISTICANALYSISOFCLASSICALCHINESEPOETRYTRANSLATION,理論語言學(xué)研究第2卷第2號2008年12月,COGNITIVELINGUISTICSANDPOETICSOFTRANSLATION,,THETASKOFTRANSLATINGONELANGUAGEINTOANOTHERPOSESAGREATCHALLENGEFORTRANSLATORSOFLITERARYTEXTSHERE,COGNITIVELINGUISTICSPROVIDESASPECIALCONTRIBUTIONTABAKOWSKA’S1993STUDYAPPLIESCOGNITIVEGRAMMARPRINCIPLESTOLITERARYTRANSLATIONDEFININGTRANSLATIONEQUIVALENCEINTERMSOFUNITSLARGERTHANASINGLESENTENCE,TABAKOWSKANOTESTHATTHESEUNITSOVERLAPWITHLANGACKER’SNOTIONSOFIMAGEANDSCENECONSTRUALINASERIESOFCASESTUDIES,TABAKOWSKASHOWSHOWCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSCONTRIBUTESTOTHEARTANDPRACTICEOFTRANSLATIONBYIPROVIDINGSYSTEMATICEXPLANATIONSFORTHEEASEORDIFFICULTYOFTRANSLATIONIIDESCRIBINGTHETECHNIQUESOFSTYLETHROUGH‘‘PAIRINGINDIVIDUALDIMENSIONSOFIMAGERYWITHPARTICULARLINGUISTICMEANS’’ANDIIIIDENTIFYINGTHEREASONSINSOMECASESFORTHEIMPOSSIBILITYOFTRANSLATIONSHECONCEDESTHAT‘‘ITTAKESAPOETTOTRANSLATEPOETRY’’BUTARGUESTHATCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSCANHELPPROVIDEBETTERUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEIMAGESANDTECHNIQUESINPOETICTEXT,STYLISTICAPPROACHESTOTRANSLATION,,STYLISTICAPPROACHESTOTRANSLATION,4COGNITIVESTYLISTICSANDTRANSLATION41THECOGNITIVETURNINSTYLISTICSANDTRANSLATIONSTUDIES42TRANSLATINGTHEMINDINTHETEXT43AMBIGUITYANDTEXTUALGAPS44FOREGROUNDING,SALIENCEANDVISIBILITY45METAPHOR,MINDANDTRANSLATION46ICONICITY,MIMESISANDDIAGESIS47COGNITIVESTYLISTICSANDTHEPRETENCEOFTRANSLATION,認知語言學(xué)的社會維度,,MOUTONDEGRUYTER2008,COGNITIVESOCIOLINGUISTICS,AUNIONOFCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSANDSOCIOLINGUISTICSWASBOUNDTOHAPPENBOTHPROCLAIMAUSAGEBASEDAPPROACHTOLANGUAGEANDAIMTOANALYSEACTUALLANGUAGEUSEINOBJECTIVEWAYSWHEREASSOCIOLINGUISTICSISBYNATUREONTHEOUTLOOKFORLANGUAGEINITSVARIETY,COGNITIVELINGUISTICSCANNOLONGERAFFORDTOIGNORESOCIALVARIATIONINLANGUAGEASITMANIFESTSITSELFINTHEUSAGEDATANORCANITFAILTOADOPTANEMPIRICALMETHODOLOGYTHATREFLECTSVARIATIONASITACTUALLYOCCURS,BEYONDTHELIMITEDKNOWLEDGEOFTHEINDIVIDUALOBSERVERCONVERSELY,WHILECOGNITIVELINGUISTICSCANONLYBENEFITFROMAHEIGHTENEDSENSITIVITYTOSOCIALASPECTS,THERICH,BOTTOMUPTHEORETICALFRAMEWORKITHASDEVELOPEDISLIKELYTOCONTRIBUTETOAMUCHBETTERUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEMEANINGOFVARIATIONISTPHENOMENA,WORLDENGLISHESACOGNITIVESOCIOLINGUISTICAPPROACH,,MOUTONDEGRUYTER2009,OVERTHELASTTHREEDECADES,THEFIELDOFLINGUISTICSSAWANUMBEROFMAJORANDREMARKABLEEVOLUTIONSAMONGTHEFOREMOSTDEVELOPMENTSISTHEEMERGENCEOFTWONEWANDGROWINGRESEARCHPARADIGMS,THECOGNITIVELINGUISTICSFRAMEWORKANDTHEWORLDENGLISHESPARADIGM,WHICHARENOWFIRMLYESTABLISHEDONTHELINGUISTICAGENDAWORLDWIDETHEDRIVINGFORCESTHATHAVELEDTOTHERISEOFTHETWOFRAMEWORKSAREQUITEDIFFERENTCLWASPROPOSEDASAGENUINETHEORETICALPARADIGM,INEXPLICITOPPOSITIONTOANDOUTOFDISAGREEMENTWITHTHETHENANDSTILLDOMINANTFRAMEWORKOFGENERATIVEGRAMMARITISTHUS,MOSTOFALL,ANOUTGROWTHOFTHEORETICALLYORIENTEDDISCOURSEANDOFAPARADIGMSHIFTWITHINTHEDISCIPLINEOFLINGUISTICSITSELF,ANDUNITESLINGUISTS,CONTROVERSIESNOTWITHSTANDING,WHOSHAREACOMMONTHEORETICALPERSPECTIVETHEFORCESTHATLEDTOTHERISEOFTHEWEPARADIGMARECRUCIALLYDIFFERENTINTHISRESPECTTHISRESEARCHFRAMEWORKISESSENTIALLYLINGUISTICS’RECOGNITIONOF,REACTIONTO,ANDREFLECTIONONDRASTICSOCIALANDSOCIOLINGUISTICDEVELOPMENTSBROUGHTABOUT,FIRSTOFALL,BYTHEDYNAMICSOFGLOBALIZATIONUNLIKECL,ITISNOTCONSTITUTEDBYACOMMONTHEORETICALBACKGROUNDRATHER,THECOMMONDENOMINATOROFTHEWEPARADIGMISTHEJOINEDINTERESTINTHELINGUISTICEFFECTSANDIMPLICATIONSOFTHESESOCIETALPROCESSES,ANDTHEREISAHIGHHETEROGENEITYOFTHEORETICALPERSPECTIVES,ADVANCESINCOGNITIVESOCIOLINGUISTICS,,MOUTONDEGRUYTER2010,EDITEDBYDIRKGEERAERTS,GITTEKRISTIANSEN,ANDYVESPEIRSMAN,PARTONELEXICALANDLEXICALSEMANTICVARIATION,HETERODOXCONCEPTFEATURESANDONOMASIOLOGICALHETEROGENEITYINDIALECTSDIRKGEERAERTS,DIRKSPEELMANMEASURINGANDPARAMETERIZINGLEXICALCONVERGENCEANDDIVERGENCEBETWEENEUROPEANANDBRAZILIANPORTUGUESEAUGUSTOSOARESDASILVAAWESOMEINSIGHTSINTOSEMANTICVARIATIONJUSTYNAAROBINSONAPPLYINGWORDSPACEMODELSTOSOCIOLINGUISTICSRELIGIONNAMESBEFOREANDAFTER9/11YVESPEIRSMAN,KRISHEYLEN,DIRKGEERAERTS,PARTTWOCONSTRUCTIONALVARIATION,THEENGLISHGENITIVEALTERNATIONINACOGNITIVESOCIOLINGUISTICSPERSPECTIVEBENEDIKTSZMRECSANYINOTACQUIRINGGRAMMATICALGENDERINTWOVARIETIESOFDUTCHGUNTHERDEVOGELAERLECTALVARIATIONINCONSTRUCTIONALSEMANTICS“BENEFACTIVE”DITRANSITIVESINDUTCHTIMOTHYCOLLEMAN,PARTTHREEVARIATIONOFLECTALAWARENESSANDATTITUDES,LECTALACQUISITIONANDLINGUISTICSTEREOTYPEFORMATIONGITTEKRISTIANSENINVESTIGATIONSINTOTHEFOLK’SMENTALMODELSOFLINGUISTICVARIETIESRAPHAELBERTHELEACOGNITIVEAPPROACHTOQUANTITATIVESOCIOLINGUISTICVARIATIONEVIDENCEFROMTHFRONTINGINCENTRALSCOTLANDLYNNCLARK,GRAEMETROUSDALE,JOURNALARTICLES,GENDERMETAPHOR1GENDERMETAPHOR2,EMPIRICALMETHODSWITHINCOGNITIVELINGUISTICS1實證研究舉例,EMOTIONALEFFECTSOFREADINGEXCERPTSFROMSHORTSTORIESBYJAMESJOYCESOMEPARAMETERSOFLITERARYANDNEWSCOMPREHENSIONEFFECTSOFDISCOURSETYPEPERSPECTIVEONREADINGRATEANDSURFACESTRUCTUREREPRESENTATIONFOREGROUNDING,DEFAMILIARIZATION,ANDAFFECTRESPONSETOLITERARYSTORIES,EMPIRICALMETHODSWITHINCOGNITIVELINGUISTICS2語料庫,,CORPORAINCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSCORPUSBASEDAPPROACHESTOSYNTAXANDLEXISMOUTONDEGRUYTER2006,COGNITIVELINGUISTICS,THEBRANCHOFLINGUISTICSTHATTRIESTO“MAKEONESACCOUNTOFHUMANLANGUAGEACCORDWITHWHATISGENERALLYKNOWNABOUTTHEMINDANDTHEBRAIN,“HASBECOMEONEOFTHEMOSTFLOURISHINGFIELDSOFCONTEMPORARYLINGUISTICSTHECHAPTERSADDRESSMANYCLASSICTOPICSOFCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSTHESETOPICSINCLUDESTUDIESONTHESEMANTICSOFSPECIFICWORDSINCLUDINGPOLYSEMYANDSYNONYMYASWELLASSEMANTICCHARACTERISTICSOFPARTICULARSYNTACTICPATTERNS/CONSTRUCTIONSINCLUDINGCONSTRUCTIONALSYNONYMYANDTHESCHEMATICITYOFCONSTRUCTIONS,THEANALYSISOFCAUSATIVES,TRANSITIVITY,ANDIMAGESCHEMATICASPECTSOFPOSTUREVERBSTHEKEYCHARACTERISTICOFTHISVOLUMEISTHATALLPAPERSADOPTTHEMETHODOLOGICALPERSPECTIVEOFCORPUSLINGUISTICS,THERAPIDLYEVOLVINGBRANCHOFLINGUISTICSBASEDONTHECOMPUTERIZEDANALYSISOFLANGUAGEUSEDINAUTHENTICSETTINGSTHUS,THECONTRIBUTIONSDONOTONLYALLPROVIDEVARIOUSNEWINSIGHTSINTHEIRRESPECTIVEFIELDS,THEYALSOINTRODUCENEWDATAASWELLASNEWCORPUSBASEDANDQUANTITATIVEMETHODSOFANALYSISONTHEBASISOFTHEIRFINDINGS,THEAUTHORSDISCUSSBOTHTHEORETICALIMPLICATIONSGOINGWELLBEYONDTHESINGULARTOPICSOFTHESTUDIESANDSHOWHOWTHEDISCIPLINEOFCOGNITIVELINGUISTICSCANBENEFITFROMTHERIGOROUSANALYSISOFNATURALLYOCCURRINGLANGUAGETHELANGUAGESWHICHAREINVESTIGATEDAREENGLISH,GERMAN,DUTCH,ANDRUSSIAN,ANDTHEDATACOMEFROMAVARIETYOFDIFFERENTCORPORAASSUCH,THEPRESENTVOLUMEWILLBEOFINTERESTTOAWIDERANGEOFSCHOLARSWITHMANYDIFFERENTFOCIANDINTERESTSANDSHOULDPAVETHEWAYF
下載積分： 6 賞幣
上傳時間：2024-01-05
頁數(shù)： 76
大小： 0.78(MB)
子文件數(shù)：
